QPC holds competing business logics together in one quantum job on IBM Heron r2, then returns rankings on raw counts with public job IDs.
6IBM desks on record
3→1Jobs vs hybrid path
31→0Merge glue steps
August 2026 · Semiconductor lithography · ibm_kingston
Six photomasks. Six logics. One job on ibm_kingston.
Public ICCAD-2013 mask ladder: print accuracy, edge placement, process window, mask width, mask space and writer cost held
co-resident across 24 measured contextures, 147 architecture qubits on the full 156-qubit register of IBM Heron r2.
Coupled ranking on raw counts: 0.622 (no-OPC) ahead of inverse-lithography at 0.460.
The ILT mask carries 30,060 width violations and 1,130 writer shots; the no-OPC mask carries zero width violations and sixteen shots.
Real decisions mix goals that pull against each other: reliability, carbon, and cost; efficacy, safety, and population; profit, risk, and fairness.
QPC keeps those logics co-resident in one quantum job on IBM Heron r2.
The logics interact during the run. The readout is a ranking you can inspect, with public job IDs.
On the same grid task we measured the three-job hybrid path against that single combined job: 3 jobs become 1, 31 merge steps become 0, and QPC is faster on the wall clock.
Desk 01
Energy · Power grid
Power Grid Nexus
Situation
Grid operators balance reliability, carbon, and cost in every dispatch-style decision. Those three pressures belong in one ranking.
What QPC did
Froze a U.S. EPA eGRID balancing-authority panel and ran one IBM job with three co-resident logics: reliability · carbon · cost.
Why it matters
A problem every utility and energy planner already understands, held as three co-resident logics in one IBM job.
Usability
Shows QPC on multi-objective infrastructure decisions where rankings must respect all three pressures together.
Result (IBM Marrakesh):
Coupled ranking of balancing authorities: PJM 0.521, BPAT 0.502, CISO 0.449.
Job ID: d9tp0bc98n5s7391tteg
Desk 02
Healthcare · Pharma
Polypharmacy Safety
Situation
A regimen holds three logics together: how well it works, how safe combinations are, and who the population is.
What QPC did
Used public OpenFDA FAERS safety data plus curated interaction flags; ran efficacy · safety · population together in one IBM job.
Why it matters
Clinical safety as a co-resident QPC desk: efficacy, combination risk, and population stay visible in one ranking.
Usability
Demonstrates QPC for healthcare tradeoffs where safety and population constraints must stay visible beside efficacy.
Result (IBM Marrakesh):
Coupled ranking of agents: levothyroxine 0.699, lisinopril 0.684, atorvastatin 0.683.
Job ID: d9tp2at35hes73fj0as0
Desk 03 · The organizing proof
One QPC job. Three logics. Zero merge glue.
On the same grid problem we measured QPC’s single combined job against a three-job hybrid path,
equal shot budget, same IBM Kingston backend. QPC organizes the three logics inside one run.
Usability:
Process proof for buyers: 3 IBM jobs become 1, 31 merge steps become 0, and QPC is faster on the wall clock of a real multi-logic task.
Desk 04
Finance · Risk & fairness
Fair Credit
Situation
Lending mixes profit, default risk, and fairness across groups. Those three logics belong in one ranking.
What QPC did
Froze a public OpenML/UCI German Credit panel; ran profit · safety · fairness together on IBM Kingston.
Why it matters
Opens the conversation with banks, fintech, and risk teams who live in multi-objective decisions every day.
Usability
QPC holds commercial, risk, and fairness logics in one architecture pass on a public credit panel, with an inspectable ranking.
Result (IBM Kingston):
Coupled ranking of applicant segments: M_A 0.623, H_A 0.564, H_O 0.560.
Job ID: d9tp8ss98n5s7391u8ig
Desk 05
Earth observation · Space
EO Tasking
Situation
When to point a sensor depends on cloud cover, mission priority, and energy budget. Those three logics belong in one ranking.
What QPC did
Used NASA POWER climatology at nine U.S. sites; ran cloud clearance · priority · energy together on IBM Kingston.
Why it matters
The same QPC desk pattern on sensing and space-adjacent scheduling: cloud, mission value, and energy in one IBM job.
Usability
A template for tasking under weather, mission value, and resource limits in one co-resident quantum job.
Result (IBM Kingston):
Coupled ranking of sites: Los Angeles 0.795, Miami 0.626, Phoenix 0.582.
Job ID: d9tp9ek98n5s7391u94g
Which desk fits your world?
If you care about…
Start here
Photomask / lithography
Mask synthesis (Kingston)
Energy, carbon, grid operations
Power Grid Nexus
Drug safety / regimens
Polypharmacy Safety
Fewer jobs, 0 merge glue, clearer process
Organizing comparison (Desk 03)
Lending, risk, fairness
Fair Credit
Satellites / sensing schedules
EO Tasking
NVIDIA hybrid stack
Job N1 expresses the same organizing idea on NVIDIA CUDA-Q
with IBM Heron public job IDs as the QPU arm: the QPC cooperation path on the NVIDIA quantum stack.
Pick one of your own multi-goal decisions. We freeze a small open or partner dataset,
run a bounded IBM desk, and return rankings plus the measured organizing comparison (3 jobs become 1).
You bring the decision. We bring the architecture.